Tesla to manufacture the Model S in the Bay Area

Chris Morrison | posted on July 1, 2008

In an event held today by Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and electric vehicle startup Tesla Motors, a few more details were revealed about the lower-priced successor to Tesla’s Roadster, production of which is still getting underway.

In a surprise move, Tesla is canceling plans to build a manufacturing plant in New Mexico, where the company had been offered significant incentives to locate. It will now build its facility somewhere in the Bay Area, near its headquarters in San Carlos.

We’ve been calling Tesla’s next model the WhiteStar, based on various rumors that have leaked — likely intentionally — from the company. That car will actually be called the Model S; Darryl Siry, the company’s chief marketing officer, says that WhiteStar was only an internal project name.

The price tag for the Model S has also been clarified somewhat, with an expected target of $60,000. The vehicle, a sedan, will have a range of 225 miles per charge.

The move is encouraging, because California is mired in a $20 billion deficit, and it seemed unlikely the state would be able to attract some more labor-intensive cleantech jobs and facilities to the state, whereas New Mexico’s governor Bill Richardson has been aggressive in chasing cleantech companies.

However, Schwarzenegger was able to pull $100 million from a discretionary fund called theAlternative Energy and Advanced Transportation Financing Authority to buy equipment for Tesla, which will lease from California with an option to buy the equipment tax-free at the end of the term. In the tight funding climate, using special funds is necessary — San Francisco’s mayor used something similar to fund its new solar incentive plan.

The total package is estimated to be worth $9 million to Tesla, a better offer than New Mexico’s $7 million. However, there’s a long way yet to go. The Model S is planned to start production in late 2010, and Tesla is still on the hunt for $100 million more in funding, last we heard.

 



1 COMMENT SO FAR


posted by: Kerry Bradshaw on July 4th, 2008 at 11:11 pm


It’s pretty funny to find anyone who beleives that a small time operation like the Tesla will geenrate any significant income for california. The Tesla roadster is manufactured elsewhere, and so will the Model S. The number of jobs are pretty trivial and they are hardly very worthwhile jobs at that. The Model S will be built as a simple battery-only electric, meaning it will, once again, like the roadster, be a niche vehicle for well-heeled types looking to greenwash their image. It’s not even worth discussing anything like emissions or gas reductions with these cars - they are so small in number that it would be absolutely impossible to detect the miniscule effect they would have on either. Sort of like the windmills that were once an object of enthusiasm, and are now mostly the oblject of critical analyses that point out that during the last brownouts, they were total no shows - weren’t producing a single watt of power as the grid collapsed for lack of power. The environmentalist’s news media hushed that dirty little secret up really well.
maybe we will soon see the university report that concludes that anti-nuclear environmental groups such as Greenpeace are responsible for global warming. The facts are astounding. They also note that the Sierra Club supported old growth forests, which are practically useless in absorbing carbon dioxide, compared to new growth.


Click Here